Extending Sutton’s “Bounds”: A Model of Endogenous Market Structure, Innovation, and Licensing
نویسنده
چکیده
License agreements constitute between 20-33% of all strategic alliances in sectors commonly identified as likely candidates for an endogenous fixed cost (EFC) model; namely biotechnology and chemicals among others. We develop a model of endogenous market structure and fixed (sunk) cost R&D investment based on Sutton (1998; 2007) and include the ability of firms to license their technology to (potential) competitors. In our model we allow firms with asymmetric R&D costs to offer multiple products differentiated vertically by quality and horizontally by attributes. We also permit firms to pursue license and crosslicense agreements as an alternate form of market consolidation which is potentially less costly compared to firm integration via mergers or acquisitions. Thus, our analysis bridges two branches of the industrial organization literature and incorporates strategic alliances into an examination of the relationship between market structure and the intensity of R&D investment. Our results indicate that incorporating the ability of firms to license their technology increases the lower bound to market concentration in R&D-intensive industries relative to the levels that Sutton’s capabilities model would predict. In contrast with Sutton’s model which predicts a lower bound to R&D intensity that is equivalent to the lower bound to concentration, we find a strictly positive increase in the bounds to R&D intensity relative to concentration when firms are able to license their technology to rivals.
منابع مشابه
Innovation, Licensing, and Market Structure in Agricultural Biotechnology
Over the past three decades, the agricultural biotechnology sector has been characterized by rapid innovation, market consolidation, and a more exhaustive definition of property rights. The industry attributes consistently identified by the literature and important to this analysis include: (i) endogenous sunk costs in the form of expenditures on R&D; (ii) seed and agricultural chemical technol...
متن کاملThe Biotechnology Sector: “Bounds” to Market Structure
This paper examines whether it makes sense to consider Sutton’s “bounds” approach as a candidate theory for explaining the recent evolution of market structure in the biotechnology sector, and to speculate whether market structure will change if the industry begins to introduce second-generation GM products that are of more direct benefit to consumers. A key result is that the market structure ...
متن کاملEndogenous sunk costs and the geographic differences in the market structures of CPG categories
We describe the industrial market structure of CPG categories. The analysis uses a unique database spanning 31 consumer package goods (CPG) categories, 39 months, and the 50 largest US metropolitan markets. We organize our description of market structure around the notion that firms can improve brand perceptions through advertising investments, as in Sutton’s endogenous sunk cost theory. The ri...
متن کاملEndogenous R&D Investment and Market Structure: A Case Study of the Agricultural Biotechnology Industry
Over the past three decades, the agricultural biotechnology sector has been characterized by rapid innovation, market consolidation, and a more exhaustive definition of property rights. The industry attributes consistently identified by the literature and important to this analysis include: (i) endogenous sunk costs in the form of expenditures on R&D; (ii) seed and agricultural chemical technol...
متن کاملManaging spillovers: An endogenous sunk cost approach
For many real-world markets (such as media, telecommunications, high tech markets, commercial aircrafts, etc.), incurring endogenous sunk costs (in the form of quality enhancing expenditures), in the presence of R&D spillovers, is an essential feature of competition. We study the interaction between these sunk costs and R&D spillovers relying on the Sutton’s concept of endogenous sunk costs and...
متن کامل